dabois

  • In this blog, Georgiev tries to show what happens when love, neediness, and envy start wearing each other’s clothes. We all have the freedom to fire our emotional bullets, but none of us get to decide where they land—or what comes back. He thought he understood the difference between needing someone and loving them. Then,…

    Read more →

  • What if love has less to do with how we feel and more to do with what we are willing to sacrifice? Through Homeric epics, Ivo translates something we keep forgetting: heroes are rarely the people who get everything right. They are the ones who, often far too late, recognise what matters and act on…

    Read more →

  • In this post, Georgiev opens with Jimmy Carr’s claim, “I don’t believe in generations,” then follows the thread through Peter Turchin’s counter‑elites and into Aristotle’s theory of emotion. He argues that categories flatten people, while real understanding requires noticing how judgement forms through experience, feeling, and self‑interest. Moving from modern commentary to ancient rhetoric, the…

    Read more →

  • The thought of maybe being a good person is what keeps me trying to be a good person” — Rue said it in Euphoria’s finale, and it hasn’t left Georgiev since. This isn’t about being good or bad. It’s about the space between them, where nothing’s decided yet. A boy from a fishing village in…

    Read more →

  • What if the future isn’t arriving at all? What if it’s already here and it’s being assembled quietly, through images, habits, algorithms, and expectations, and sold back to us as something inevitable? This time, Georgiev follows a suspicion that took root in his mind: perhaps advertising doesn’t describe reality and perhaps it only creates the…

    Read more →

  • Every man imagines the man he wants to become, but few are those who sit long enough with the man they already are. In this blog, Georgiev struggles with what he’s been thinking about lately: whether masculinity is ambition, sacrifice, discipline, freedom — or simply accepting that life doesn’t always unfold the way we imagined.…

    Read more →

  • Society hates visible appetite while secretly orbiting it. In Georgiev’s words, Bonnie Blue is that visible appetite made articulate, and that alone makes her one of the most disorienting figures in contemporary culture. But this isn’t explicitly about her. It’s about what she exposes: the gap between the life we perform and the life we…

    Read more →

  • Gandhi’s famous words aren’t a comfort – they’re a demand. This week, Georgiev dissects a phrase about what real change actually requires: not posts or protests, but the brutal work of transformation when no one’s watching. He tears apart the gap between who we claim to be and who we actually are – the lies…

    Read more →

  • Georgiev confronts an uncomfortable truth: not everyone can handle the truths you carry, and pretending otherwise is carelessness masquerading as courage. Drawing from Simone Weil’s insight that even Christ spoke differently to crowds than to friends, he explores why secrets aren’t lies but responsibilities, and why radical transparency often kills the very truths it claims…

    Read more →

  • In “Freedom as a Function Between Liberty and Death,” Ivaniel Georgiev delivers a philosophical gut-punch. He interrogates the tension between living freely and the inevitability of mortality, asking whether true liberty can exist without the shadow of death. With poetic rigor and existential depth, Georgiev challenges readers to consider freedom not as a static right,…

    Read more →